(Information as of January 7, 2026)
Office of Audits
Oversight of the Infrastructure Support Services Contract
Our objective is to determine whether the FDIC provided effective oversight of the Infrastructure Support Services contract to ensure compliance with service level metrics, invoice review and approval procedures, and data protection and security controls.
FDIC's Valuation process for Large Regional Bank Resolutions
Our objective is to determine the extent to which the FDIC adhered to established policies and procedures consistent with FDI Act requirements for the valuation function in response to the failures of Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank, and First Republic Bank.
Audit of the FDIC's Cyber Incident Detection and Response Function
Our objective is to determine to what extent the FDIC has implemented processes to detect, respond, and actively defend against cyber threats.
CIGFO - Audit of FSOC’s Designation of Nonbank Financial Companies
The objectives of this audit are to assess (1) the sufficiency of the new guidance to effectively respond to financial stability threats as authorized under Section 113 of Dodd-Frank; (2) the extent that the FSOC Members were engaged in the development of the new guidance considering such factors as lessons learned and any identified barriers from earlier guidance; and (3) the impact on the nonbank designation process as a result of the new guidance compared to prior guidance and processes.
In-Depth Review of Pulaski Savings Bank
The objectives of the In-Depth Review are to (1) determine the cause(s) of Pulaski Savings Bank’s failure and resulting loss to the Deposit Insurance Fund and (2) evaluate the FDIC’s supervision of the bank, including the FDIC’s implementation of the Prompt Corrective Action requirements of Section 38 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act.
FDIC Examinations of Banks’ AML/CFT and Sanctions Compliance
The objective is to determine whether (1) the FDIC effectively conducted AML/CFT examination scoping and planning activities, and to what extent planning decisions align with identified risks, and (2) the examiners have the necessary training and skills to evaluate AML/CFT and sanctions compliance.